Seksualno delo globalno, 2022: Sistematični pregled mednarodne literature o vplivu stigme na poklicna tveganja

Osnovne informacije o raziskavi

ADP - IDNo: SDSLO22
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_SDSLO22_V1
Glavni avtor(ji):
  • Markelj, Leja
  • Šori, Iztok
  • Bajt, Veronika
  • Bolko, Irena
  • Hrženjak, Majda
  • Učakar, Tjaša
Izdelal datoteko podatkov:
MI - Mirovni inštitut (Ljubljana, Slovenija; 2022)

Finančna podpora:

Javna agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije

Številka projekta:

J5-2556; P5-0413 (ARRS)

Vsebina raziskave

Ključne besede ADP: seksualno delo, poklicna tveganja, stigma, varnost, tveganje, profesionalizacija, delo, zaposlitev

Ključne besede ELSST:
KARIERA, SPOLNA INDUSTRIJA, POKLICNA IZPOSTAVLJENOST

Vsebinska področja CESSDA
Delo in zaposlovanje
Vsebinsko področja CERIF
Sociologija
Vsebinska področja ADP
NASILJE
ZASEBNO ŽIVLJENJE
POSEL
ZDRAVJE
DOSTOP DO STORITEV


Povzetek:

Stigma je najpomembnejša strukturna determinanta zdravja in varnosti pri delu v seksualnem delu. Čeprav se je koncept stigme v zadnjih desetletjih razvil, še vedno obstajajo vrzeli v razumevanju kompleksnosti tega pojava. Kot odgovor na te vrzeli je bil izveden sistematični pregled literature, pri čemer so raziskovalci upoštevali kvalitativne, kvantitativne in študije z mešanimi metodami, objavljene po vsem svetu med letoma 2010 in 2020. Iskali so povezave med različnimi vrstami stigme in poklicnimi tveganji, pri čemer so upoštevali vpliv pravnega konteksta. Preučili so pričakovano, izkušeno, ponotranjeno, večplastno, zaznano in sekundarno stigmo ter raziskali, kako stigme vplivajo na dostop seksualnih delavk_cev do storitev, na njihova zasebna življenja, zdravje, varnost in kariero. Raziskovali so tudi vpliv stigme na poklicna tveganja v različnih pravnih modelih regulacije seksualnega dela.

Metodologija


Čas zbiranja podatkov: 2021 - 2022
Čas izdelave: 2022
Država: Avstralija, Bangladeš, Bolivija, Brazilija, Kanada, Kitajska, Kostarika, Danska, Dominikanska republika, Gvatemala, Indija, Izrael, Kenija, Laos, Libanon, Mongolija, Nepal, Nizozemska, Nova Zelandija, Portoriko, Južna Afrika, Šri Lanka, Tanzanija, Tajska, Uganda, Združeno kraljestvo, Združene države Amerike, Vietnam, Zimbabve
Geografsko pokritje:

Vse naštete države.

Enota za analizo:

Medijska enota: besedilo

Populacija:

Vključeni so znanstveni članki iz celega sveta, ki so izpolnjevali naslednje kriterije: obravnavajo povezave med stigmo in poklicnimi tveganji v seksualnem delu; objavljeni so bili v znanstvenih revijah med leti 2010 in 2020 v angleškem jeziku; imajo dostopen povzetek.

Izključeni:

Izključene so bile študije, ki niso imele empirične podlage in niso vključevale seksualnih delavk_cev v svoj vzorec; študije, ki so vključevale mladoletne osebe; mednarodno primerjalne študije; študije, ki niso pristopale k seksualnemu delu iz poklicne perspektive; in študije, ki niso eksplicitno obravnavale vpliva stigme na poklicna tveganja ali niso opredelile stigme kot neodvisne ali posredniške spremenljivke v povezavi s poklicnimi tveganji.

Zbiranje podatkov je opravil:

Mirovni inštitut

Tip vzorca:

Zajeta celotna populacija

V prvi fazi je bil izveden pregled znanstvenih člankov, objavljenih v obdobju od 2010 do 2020, z iskanjem v iskalniku mEga, ki ga upravlja Nacionalna in univerzitetna knjižnica Slovenije. Pri iskanju so bile uporabljene naslednje ključne besede v angleškem jeziku: "seksualno delo" in "poklic" in "tveganje" in "stigma". Dodatni članki so bili identificirani z ročnim pregledom bibliografij ustreznih študij in osebnih baz raziskovalcev. V nadaljevanju so bile študije izbrane na podlagi kriterijev za vključitev (kriteriji so navedeni v delu "populacija"). Dva glavna raziskovalca sta neodvisno pregledala članke glede na kriterije za ustreznost v dveh korakih. Najprej sta pregledala naslove in povzetke. Če izbire ni bilo mogoče narediti na podlagi te informacije, je bil izveden tudi pregled celotnega besedila. V primeru nesoglasja glede ustreznosti določenih člankov sta raziskovalca izvedla razpravo s celotno raziskovalno skupino. Kriteriji za zagotavljanje kakovosti vključenih študij: (1) objava v recenzirani akademski reviji; (2) opis metodologije ustreza akademskim standardom (opis raziskovalnega problema, raziskovalna vprašanja ali hipoteze, metode, odgovori na raziskovalna vprašanja); (3) jasen opis demografskih značilnosti vzorca, kot so starost, zakonski stan, izobrazba in kraj zaposlitve. Študije z oceno kakovosti med 2 in 3 so bile ocenjene kot visoko kakovostne in vključene v pregled. Študije, ki niso dosegle ocene 3, a so bile vseeno vključene, so imele predvsem pomanjkljivosti pri opisu vzorca.

Način zbiranja podatkov:

Kodiranje vsebine

Uteževanje:

Brez uteževanja.

Omejitve dostopa

Podatki in dokumentacija so na voljo pod mednarodno licenco Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0. Arhiv izroča podatke uporabnikom samo za namen, ki ga posebej opredelijo, ob zagotovitvi spoštovanja profesionalnih etičnih kodeksov. Uporabnik se posebej zaveže, da bo skrbel za tajnost podatkov in opravljal analize brez poskusov identifikacije posameznika.

Kontakt: Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov

Pri objavah, ki bi sledile na podlagi podatkov, je potrebno polno citirati avtorja in Arhiv.

Vsak uporabnik je dolžan opozoriti na morebitne pomanjkljivosti gradiva in poslati Arhivu 2 kopiji nastalih besedil.

Uporabnik naj pred uporabo pozorno prebere spremljajočo dokumentacijo in se v primeru nejasnosti obrne na avtorje raziskave ali Arhiv.

Osnovne informacije o datoteki podatkov

Naslov podatkovne datoteke: Sex work globally, 2022: A systematic review of the international literature on the impact of stigma on occupational risks. Podatki [Podatkovna datoteka]

ID datoteke: F1

Avtor podatkovne datoteke: Markelj, Leja; Šori, Iztok; Bajt, Veronika; Bolko, Irena; Hrženjak, Majda; Učakar, Tjaša

Format: *.txt - TEKST

Datum in kraj nastanka: datum, kraj nastanka

  • število spremenljivk: 75
  • število enot: 76

Licenca: Podatki in dokumentacija so na voljo pod licenco Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 2.5 Slovenija.

Verzija: 7.september 2023

Spremenljivke

ID_1 ID_1

Entrance number according to the alphabetical order of the author.

Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
76 105 1 76 38.5 22.083

Vrednosti spremenljivk od 1 do 76

AY_1 Author and Year_1

Surname of the first author; et all if several authors. The year of publishing of the study.

Vrednost 22 Frekvenca
Abel, 2011 1
Abel, 2014 1
Argento et al., 2018 1
Armstrong, 2018 1
Aunon et al., 2015 1
Bahri, 2019 1
Basnyat, 2014 1
Basnyat, 2015 1
Basu, 2010 1
Beckham et al., 2015 1
Begum et al., 2014 1
Benoit et al., 2017 1
Benoit et al., 2019 1
Bjønness, 2012 1
Blithe and Wolfe, 2016 1
Bowen and Bungay, 2016 1
Bowen, 2015 1
Bungay and Guta, 2018 1
Carrasco et al., 2017 1
Closson et al., 2015 1
Conn et al., 2017 1
Dodsworth, 2012 1
Faini et al., 2020 1
Fernández-Esquer et al., 2012 1
Ganju and Saggurti, 2017 1
Goldenberg et al., 2015 1
Gorry et al., 2010 1
Ham et al., 2014 1
Ham et al., 2016 1
Harris et al., 2011 1
Heravian et al., 2012 1
Huber et al., 2019 1
Hunt et al., 2017 1
Jiao and Bungay, 2018 1
Jiménez et al., 2011 1
Jung et al., 2016 1
Karunanayake et al., 2020 1
Krüsi et al., 2016 1
Lavin, 2014 2
Leaker and Dunk West, 2011 1
Logie et al., 2011 1
Lyons et al., 2017 1
Ma and Loke, 2019 1
Mastin et al., 2015 1
Mavin and Grandy, 2010 1
McCausland et al., 2020 1
McCray et al., 2011 1
McLean, 2012 1
Morrow 1
Murphy et al., 2015 1
Murray et al., 2010 1
Orchard et al., 2018 1
Parmley et al., 2020 1
Phrasisombath et al., 2012 1
Pitcher, 2019 1
Raguparan, 2017 1
Rivers-Moore, 2010 1
Robillard, 2010 1
Sallmann, 2010 1
Sardana et al., 2016 1
Scorgie et al., 2013a 1
Scorgie et al., 2013b 1
Shewly et al., 2020 1
Smith et al., 2014 1
Ssekamatte et al., 2020 1
Tokar et al., 2020 1
Trautner and Collett, 2010 1
Tsang et al., 2019 1
Willis et al., 2014 1
Witte et al., 2010 1
Wong et al., 2011 1
Yu et al., 2016 1
Yuen et al., 2014 1
Zarhin and Fox, 2017 1
Zhang et al., 2015 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
76 0

Countr_1 Country_1

The name of the country where the study was conducted.

Vrednost 31 Frekvenca
Australia 9
Bangladesh 2
Bolivia 1
Brazil 1
Canada 13
China 5
Costa Rica 1
Denmark 1
Dominican Republic 1
Guatemala 1
India 4
Israel 1
Kenya 1
Kenya, South Africa, Uganda, Zimbabwe 2
Laos 1
Lebanon 1
Mongolia 1
Nepal 2
Netherlands 1
New Zealand 3
Puerto Rico 1
South Africa 1
Sri Lanka 1
Tanzania 2
Thailand 1
UK 4
USA 4
USA, Arkansas 1
USA, Florida 1
USA, Nevada 1
USA, Texas 2
Uganda 1
Vietnam 2
Zimbabwe 2
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
76 0

ID_1 ID_1

Entrance number according to the alphabetical order of the author.

Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
76 105 1 76 38.5 22.083

Vrednosti spremenljivk od 1 do 76

AY_1 Author and Year_1

Surname of the first author; et all if several authors. The year of publishing of the study.

Vrednost 274 Frekvenca
Abel, 2011 1
Abel, 2014 1
Argento et al., 2018 1
Armstrong, 2018 1
Aunon et al., 2015 1
Bahri, 2019 1
Basnyat, 2014 1
Basnyat, 2015 1
Basu, 2010 1
Beckham et al., 2015 1
Begum et al., 2014 1
Benoit et al., 2017 1
Benoit et al., 2019 1
Bjønness, 2012 1
Blithe and Wolfe, 2016 1
Bowen and Bungay, 2016 1
Bowen, 2015 1
Bungay and Guta, 2018 1
Carrasco et al., 2017 1
Closson et al., 2015 1
Conn et al., 2017 1
Dodsworth, 2012 1
Faini et al., 2020 1
Fernández-Esquer et al., 2012 1
Ganju and Saggurti, 2017 1
Goldenberg et al., 2015 1
Gorry et al., 2010 1
Ham et al., 2014 1
Ham et al., 2016 1
Harris et al., 2011 1
Heravian et al., 2012 1
Huber et al., 2019 1
Hunt et al., 2017 1
Jiao and Bungay, 2018 1
Jiménez et al., 2011 1
Jung et al., 2016 1
Karunanayake et al., 2020 1
Krüsi et al., 2016 1
Lavin, 2014 2
Leaker and Dunk West, 2011 1
Logie et al., 2011 1
Lyons et al., 2017 1
Ma and Loke, 2019 1
Mastin et al., 2015 1
Mavin and Grandy, 2010 1
McCausland et al., 2020 1
McCray et al., 2011 1
McLean, 2012 1
Morrow 1
Murphy et al., 2015 1
Murray et al., 2010 1
Orchard et al., 2018 1
Parmley et al., 2020 1
Phrasisombath et al., 2012 1
Pitcher, 2019 1
Raguparan, 2017 1
Rivers-Moore, 2010 1
Robillard, 2010 1
Sallmann, 2010 1
Sardana et al., 2016 1
Scorgie et al., 2013a 1
Scorgie et al., 2013b 1
Shewly et al., 2020 1
Smith et al., 2014 1
Ssekamatte et al., 2020 1
Tokar et al., 2020 1
Trautner and Collett, 2010 1
Tsang et al., 2019 1
Willis et al., 2014 1
Witte et al., 2010 1
Wong et al., 2011 1
Yu et al., 2016 1
Yuen et al., 2014 1
Zarhin and Fox, 2017 1
Zhang et al., 2015 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
76 0

Countr_1 Country_1

The name of the country where the study was conducted.

Vrednost 373 Frekvenca
Australia 9
Bangladesh 2
Bolivia 1
Brazil 1
Canada 13
China 5
Costa Rica 1
Denmark 1
Dominican Republic 1
Guatemala 1
India 4
Israel 1
Kenya 1
Kenya, South Africa, Uganda, Zimbabwe 2
Laos 1
Lebanon 1
Mongolia 1
Nepal 2
Netherlands 1
New Zealand 3
Puerto Rico 1
South Africa 1
Sri Lanka 1
Tanzania 2
Thailand 1
UK 4
USA 4
USA, Arkansas 1
USA, Florida 1
USA, Nevada 1
USA, Texas 2
Uganda 1
Vietnam 2
Zimbabwe 2
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
76 0

legal_1 Legislation model_1

Legislation model in place in country when the study was conducted.

Vrednost 472 Frekvenca
criminalisation of purchase of sex 12
full criminalisation 28
full decriminalisation 4
partial criminalisation 21
regulator model 1
regulatory model 10
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
76 0

Method_1 Methods

Type of the study (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed) and research methods used.

Vrednost 571 Frekvenca
Mixed/ in-depth interviews, survey questionnaire 1
Mixed/focus group discussions, survey questionnaire 1
Mixed/in-depth interviews, ethnographic network mapping and egocentric network surveying 1
Mixed/in-depth interviews, survey questionnaire 1
Qualitative/ ethnographic methods 1
Qualitative/ focus group discussions 1
Qualitative/ethnographic methods 3
Qualitative/focus group discussions 5
Qualitative/in-depth interviews 42
Qualitative/in-depth interviews, ethnographic methods 10
Qualitative/in-depth interviews, focus group discussions 9
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
75 0

Sample_1 Sample

The number of sex workers included in the sample and their gender. FSW - female sex workers, MSW - male sex workers, TSW - trans sex workers.

Vrednost 670 Frekvenca
10 (FSW) 3
11 (FSW) 1
12 (FSW) 2
136 (FSW, MSW, TSW) 2
14 (FSW) 2
14 (FSW, TSW) 1
15 (MSW) 1
16 (MSW) 1
17 (FSW) 1
18 (FSW) 2
196 (FSW) 1
203 (FSW) 1
21 (FSW) 1
218 (FSW, MSW, TSW) 2
22 (FSW) 2
22 (FSW, MSW) 1
23 (FSW) 1
23 (MSW) 2
24 (FSW) 3
26 (FSW) 1
28 (FSW) 1
30 (FSW) 1
31 (FSW) 1
31 (FSW, TSW) 1
32 (FSW) 1
33 (FSW) 2
33 (FSW, MSW) 1
33 (MSW) 1
33 (TSW) 1
34 (FSW) 1
35 (FSW) 2
371 (FSW, MSW, TSW) 1
38 (FSW) 1
39 (FSW) 1
39 (MSW, TSW) 1
40 (FSW) 1
40 (FSW, MSW, TSW) 1
40 (MSW) 1
46 (FSW, MSW) 1
48 (FSW) 1
5 (FSW) 3
50 (FSW) 1
55 (FSW, MSW) 1
58 (FSW, MSW, TSW) 1
6 (FSW) 1
60 (FSW) 1
63 (FSW) 1
67 (FSW) 1
68 (TSW) 1
7 (FSW) 2
72 (FSW) 1
772 (FSW, MSW, TSW) 1
8 (FSW, MSW) 1
85 (FSW, MSW, TSW) 1
9 (FSW) 2
90 (TSW) 1
N/A 2
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
75 0

Pol_1 Police Violence topic:

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on police violence

Vrednost 769 Frekvenca
targeted raids 2
violence and harassment 5
violence and harassment; targeted raids 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
8 0

Pol_MD_1 Police_main domain 1 Violence topic:

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on police violence. . See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 868 Frekvenca
violence and harassment 7
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
7 0

Pol_ST_1 Police_Stygma type Violence topic:

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 967 Frekvenca
experienced 8
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
8 0

Cli_1 Client Clients topic

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on client violence.

Vrednost 1066 Frekvenca
felt stigma through client interactions 1
increased vulnerability to violence 1
normalisation of client violence 2
normalization of client violence 2
normalization of client violence; increased vulnerability to violence 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
7 0

Cli_MD_1 Client_Main domain Clients topic

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on client violence. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 1165 Frekvenca
normalisation of discrimination and violence 4
normalization of discrimination and violence; violence and harassment 1
violence and harassment 2
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
7 0

Cli_ST_1 Cleint_Stigma type Clients topic

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 1264 Frekvenca
experienced 1
internalized 2
perceived 3
perceived; experienced 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
7 0

SW1_1 SW

Occupational risks arising from the impact of stigma on violence by sex workers. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 1363 Frekvenca
intra-industry stigma through hierarchization 3
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
3 0

Ge_1 General Private lives topic

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on private lives in general. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 1462 Frekvenca
leading double lives 13
leading double lives; negative consequences of disclosure 1
leading double lives; social isolation 1
leading double lives; social isolation; negative consequences of disclosure 1
leading double lives; having to lie about income 2
negative consequences of disclosure 2
social isolation 2
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
22 0

Ge_MD1_1 General_Main domain 1 Private lives topic

GeneraL. Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on private lives in general. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 1561 Frekvenca
double lives 18
negative impact on relationships 4
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
22 0

Ge_MD2_1 General_Main domain 2 Private lives topic

General: Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on private lives in general. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 1660 Frekvenca
negative impact on relationships 3
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
3 0

Ge_ST1_1 General_Stigma type 1 Private lives topic

General: Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 1759 Frekvenca
anticipated 16
anticipated; 1
anticipated; experienced 1
experienced 4
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
22 0

Ge_ST2_1 General_Stigma type 2 Private lives topic

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 1858 Frekvenca
experienced 2
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
2 0

Fam_1 Family Private lives topic

Family: Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on families. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 1957 Frekvenca
leading double lives 8
leading double lives; stigmatization of children 1
leading double lives; motherhood role conflict 1
leading double lives; negative impact on family relationships 1
motherhood role conflict 5
negative impact on family relationships 5
stigmatization of children 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
22 0

Fam_MD1_1 Family Maind domain 1 Private lives topic

Family: Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on families. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 2056 Frekvenca
double lives 12
negative impact on relationships 4
role conflict 4
stigmatization of close persons 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
21 0

Fam_MD2_1 Family Main domain 2 Private lives topic

Family: Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on families. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 2155 Frekvenca
negative impact on relationships 1
role conflict 2
stigmatization of close persons 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
4 0

Fam_ST1_1 Family Stigma type 1 Private lives topic

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 2254 Frekvenca
anticipated 11
experienced 5
internalized 3
internalzed 1
perceived 1
secondary 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
22 0

Fam_ST2_1 Family Stigma type 2 Private lives topic

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 2353 Frekvenca
experienced 1
perceived 1
secondary 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
3 0

Part_1 Partnerships Private lives topic

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on partnerships. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 2452 Frekvenca
difficulties with maintaining relationship 3
difficulties with maintaining relationship; termination of relationships; feelings of guilt 1
leading double lives 2
stigma as a barrier to leaving unhealthy relationship 1
stigma as a source of intimate partner violence 1
stigma as a source of intimate partner violence; stigmatization of partners 1
stigma as a source of intimate partner violence; termination of relationships 1
stigmatization of partners 1
threat of disclosure by intimate partner; difficulties with maintaining relationship; termination of relationships 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
12

PartMD1_1 Partnerships Main domain 1 Private lives topic

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on partnerships. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 2551 Frekvenca
difficulties with maintaining relationship 1
double lives 2
negative impact on relationship 1
negative impact on relationships 2
normalization of discrimination and violence 1
stigmatization of close persons 1
violence and harassment 4
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
12 0

PartMD2_1 Partnerships Main domain 2 Private lives topic

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on partnerships. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 2650 Frekvenca
difficulties with maintaining relationship 1
negative impact on relationships 3
stigmatization of close persons 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
5 0

P_ST1_1 Partnerships Stigma type 1 Private lives topic

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 2749 Frekvenca
anticipated 3
experienced 7
internalized 1
secondary 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
12 0

P_ST2_1 Partnerships Stigma type 2 Private lives topic

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 2848 Frekvenca
experienced 1
internalized 1
secondary 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
3 0

Fr_1 Friendships Private lives topic

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on friendships. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 2947 Frekvenca
inability to form friendships outside the industry 4
inability to form friendships outside the industry; termination of relationships 1
negative impact on friendship 1
termination of relationships 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
7 0

Fr_MD1_1 Friendships Main domain 1 Private lives topic

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on friendships. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 3046 Frekvenca
negative impact on relationships 7
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
7 0

Fr_MD2_1 Friendships Main domain 2 Private lives topic

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on friendships. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 3145 Frekvenca
negative impact on relationships 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
1 0

Fr_ST1_1 Friendships Stigma type 1 Private lives topic

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 3244 Frekvenca
anticipated 5
experienced 2
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
7 0

Fr_ST2_1 Friendships Stigma type 2 Private lives topic

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 3343 Frekvenca
experienced 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
1 0

Car_1 Career

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on careers. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 3442 Frekvenca
denied or limited job opportunities 3
leading double lives 2
limited job opportunities 1
negative impact on job satisfaction; leading double lives 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
7 0

Car_MD1_1 Career Main domain 1

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on careers. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 3541 Frekvenca
discrimination 3
double lives 2
job satisfaction 1
negative impact on sense of self/self-esteem 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
7 0

Car_MD2_1 Career Main domain 2

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on careers. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 3640 Frekvenca
double lives 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
1 0

Car_ST_1 Career Stigma type

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 3739 Frekvenca
anticipated 3
experienced 3
internalized 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
7 0

Men_1 Mental health

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on mental health. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 3838 Frekvenca
mental distress 11
mental distress; living on the line of (un)acceptable causes psychological vulnerability 1
mental distress; negative impact on sense of self/self-esteem 1
negative impact on sense of self/self-esteem 4
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
17 0

Men_MD1_1 Mental health Main domain 1

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on mental health. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 3937 Frekvenca
mental distress 13
negative impact on sense of self/self-esteem 4
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
17 0

Men_MD2_1 Mental health Main domain 2

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on mental health. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 4036 Frekvenca
mental distress 1
negative impact on sense of self/self-esteem 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
2 0

Men_ST1_1 Mental health Stigma type 1

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 4135 Frekvenca
anticipated 8
anticipated, 1
experienced 3
internalized; perceived 1
perceived 4
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
17 0

Men_ST2_1 Mental health stigma type 2

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 4234 Frekvenca
perceived 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
1 0

AD_1 Alcohol and drugs

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on alcohol and drug use. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 4333 Frekvenca
form of self-medication 10
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
10 0

AD_MD_1 Alcohol and drugs Main domain

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on alcohol and drug use. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 4432 Frekvenca
form of self-medication 9
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
9 0

AD_ST_1 Alcohol and drugs Main domain

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 4531 Frekvenca
internalized 10
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
10 0

Sex_1 Sexual health

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on sexual health. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 4630 Frekvenca
increased vulnerability for STI 2
threat of HIV increasing stigma 2
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
4 0

Sex_MD_1 Sexual health Main domain

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on sexual health. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 4729 Frekvenca
STI 4
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
4 0

Sex_ST_1 Sexual health Stigma type

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 4828 Frekvenca
layered 2
perceived/ internalized 1
perceived/internalized 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
4 0

Se_1 Services

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on access to services. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 4927 Frekvenca
denied or delayed services; normalisation of discrimination 1
denied or delayed services; disclosure by professionals 1
disclosure by professionals 1
discriminatory treatment 3
discriminatory treatment; stigma as a barrier to utilization of services 1
discriminatory treatment; denied or delayed services 1
discriminatory treatment; denied or delayed services; inadequate services 1
discriminatory treatment; denied or delayed services; prejudiced or biased services; inadequate services; disclosure causing additional costs for treatment; disclosure by professionals 1
discriminatory treatment; disclosure by professionals; stigma as a barrier to utilization of services 1
discriminatory treatment; prejudiced or biased services; denied or delayed services 1
inadequate services 3
inadequate services; discriminatory treatment 1
leading double lives 1
leading double lives; discriminatory treatment; prejudices or biased services 1
leading double lives; inadequate services; denied or delayed services; prejudiced or biased services 1
leading double lives; denied or delayed services 1
leading double lives; inadequate services 1
leading double lives; stigma as a barrier to utilization of services; inadequate services; fear for children custody; discriminatory treatment; prejudiced or biased services; denied or delayed services; disclosure by professionals; children receive p 1
normalisation of discrimination; discriminatory treatment, prejudiced or biased services 1
prejudiced or biased services 1
prejudiced or biased services; disclosure causing additional costs for treatment 1
prejudiced or biased services; inadequate services 1
stigma as a barrier to utilization of services 6
stigma as a barrier to utilization of services; discriminatory treatment 4
stigma as a barrier to utilization of services; inadequate services 3
stigma as a barrier to utilization of services; prejudiced or biased services 1
stigma as a barrier to utilization of services; inadequate services 1
stigma as a barrier to utilization of services; prejudiced or biased services 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
42

Se_MD1_1 Services Main domain 1

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on access to services. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 5026 Frekvenca
barriers to utilization of services 16
discrimination 8
discrimination; 1
discrimination; prejudiced or inadequate treatment; violence and harassment 1
discrimination; violence and harassment 1
double lives 4
double lives; barriers to utilization of services; prejudiced or inadequate treatment; role conflict 1
double lives; prejudiced or inadequate treatment 1
normalisation of discrimination and violence 1
prejudiced or biased services; discrimination 1
prejudiced or inadequate treatment 5
prejudiced or inadequate treatments 1
violence and harassment 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
42 0

Se_MD2_1 Services Main domain 2

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on access to services. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 5125 Frekvenca
barriers to utilization of services 2
barriers to utilization of services; double lives 1
discrimination 8
discrimination; prejudiced or inadequate treatment; violence and harassment 1
normalisation of discrimination and violence 1
prejudiced or inadequate treatment 8
prejudiced or inadequate treatment, discrimination 1
prejudiced or inadequate treatment; violence and harassment 1
violence and harassment 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
24 0

Se_MD3_1 Services Main domain 3

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on access to services. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 5224 Frekvenca
discrimination 2
prejudiced or inadequate treatmen 2
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
4 0

SE_ST1_1 Services Stigma type 1

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 5323 Frekvenca
anticipated 22
anticipated; 1
anticipated; experienced 2
experienced 16
internalized 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
42 0

SE_ST2_1 Services Stigma type 2

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 5422 Frekvenca
anticipated 2
experienced 14
internalized 2
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
18 0

SE_ST3_1 Services Stigma type 3

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 5521 Frekvenca
secondary 2
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
2 0

H_1 Housing

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on housing. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 5620 Frekvenca
difficulties with obtaining secure housing 2
difficulties with obtaining secure housing ; leading double lives 1
difficulties with obtaining secure housing; harassment, surveillance or eviction 1
harassment, surveillance, eviction 1
leading double lives 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
6 0

H_MD1_1 Housing Main domain 1

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on housing. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 5719 Frekvenca
discrimination 4
double lives 1
violence and harassment 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
6 0

H_MD2_1 Housing Main domain 2

Occupational risk(s) arising from the impact of stigma on housing. See the supplementary document with occupational risks and main domains.

Vrednost 5818 Frekvenca
double lives 1
violence and harassment 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
2 0

H_ST1_1 Housing Stigma type 1

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 5917 Frekvenca
anticipated 1
experienced 5
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
6 0

H_ST2_1 Housing Stigma type 2

Stigma type(s) impacting this occupational risk(s):

Vrednost 6016 Frekvenca
anticipated 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
1 0

ID_2 ID 2

Entrance number according to the alphabetical order of the author.

Vrednost 6115 Frekvenca
1 1
2 1
3 1
4 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
8 1
9 1
10 1
11 1
12 1
13 1
14 1
Sysmiss 167
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14 167

Vrednosti spremenljivk od 1 do 14

Auth_2 Author_2

Surname of the first author; et all if several authors. The year of publishing of the study.

Vrednost 6214 Frekvenca
Carlson et al., 2017 1
Carrasco et al., 2018 1
Kamise, 2013 1
King et al., 2013 1
Lazarus et al., 2012 1
Moazzami et al., 2019 1
Nyblade et al., 2017 1
Poliah et al., 2017 1
Rössler et al., 2010 1
Schwartz et al., 2016 1
Valente et al., 2020 1
Zhang et al., 2017 1
Zulliger et al., 2015a 1
Zulliger et al., 2015b 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14 0

Count_2 Country_2

The name of the country where the study was conducted.

Vrednost 6313 Frekvenca
Canada 1
China 1
Dominican Republic 3
Japan 1
Kenya 1
Lesotho 1
Mongolia 1
Russia 1
South Africa 2
Switzerland 1
USA 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14 0

Legal_2 Legal model_2

Legislation model in place in country when the study was conducted:

Vrednost 6412 Frekvenca
Full criminalisation 8
Partial criminalisation 5
Regulatory model 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14 0

Samp_2_1 Methodology & Sample_2_1

Type of the study (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed), research methods used, number and gender of sex workers included in the sample of the study. FSW - female sex workers, MSW - male sex workers, TSW - trans sex workers.

Vrednost 6511 Frekvenca
Quantitative/ computer-assisted self-interviewing and interviewer administered questionnaire, voluntary HIV and STI testing 1
Quantitative/ face-to-face administered survey questionnaire 1
Quantitative/ survey questionnaire 1
Quantitative/ survey questionnaire, voluntary HIV and STI screening 1
Quantitative/computer-based, interviewer-administered assessment 1
Quantitative/face-to-face administered survey questionnaire 1
Quantitative/interviewer-administered questionnaire 1
Quantitative/interviewer-administered questionnaire, HIV testing 1
Quantitative/interviewer-administered questionnaire, health assessment by a nurse, syphilis testing, 1
Quantitative/self-administered survey questionnaire 1
Quantitative/survey questionnaire 3
Quantitative/survey questionnaire, voluntary HIV screening 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14

Samp_2_2 Methodology & Sample_2_2

Type of the study (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed), research methods used, number and gender of sex workers included in the sample of the study. FSW - female sex workers, MSW - male sex workers, TSW - trans sex workers.

Vrednost 6610 Frekvenca
Binary analyses (chi-square and sample t-test), linear regression 1
Bivariate analysis, Pearson chi-square test, 2-sided t-test, simple and multiple logistic regression 1
Bivariate analysis, multivariate linear regression analyses, structural equation modelling (SEM) 1
Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression 1
Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test, cluster analysis 1
Logistic regression 1
Logistic regression, cluster analyses 1
Logistic regression, descriptive statistical analysis, bivariate analysis 1
Multivariable negative binominal regression 1
Path analysis, cluster analysis 1
Pearson chi-square test, two-sided ANOVA test, simple and multiple logistic regression 1
Robust Poisson regression 2
Structural equation modelling (SEM) 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14 0

Samp_2_3 Methodology & Sample_2_3

Type of the study (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed), research methods used, number and gender of sex workers included in the sample of the study. FSW - female sex workers, MSW - male sex workers, TSW - trans sex workers.

Vrednost 679 Frekvenca
139 (FSW) 1
155 (FSW, MSW) 1
193 (FSW) 1
222 (FSW) 1
228 (FSW) 1
252 (FSW) 1
268 (FSW) 2
410 (FSW) 1
729 (FSW, MSW) 1
744 (FSW) 1
92 (FSW) 1
971 (FSW) 1
98 (MSW) 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14 0

Stig_2 Stigma measurement

Analysis techniques used in the study to measure the impact of stigma.

Vrednost 688 Frekvenca
FSW-related internalized stigma scale, 7 items on a 5-point Likert scale 1
FSW-related internalized stigma, 8 items on a 5-point Likert scale and one factor with Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88. In addition binary questions were applied to assess experienced stigma 2
Perceived occupational stigma scale, 6 items on a 4-point scale 1
Scale with binary responses, namely sex work-related stigma scale binary responses (up to 25 points). In addition binary questions were applied to assess experienced and anticipated stigma 1
Scale with binary responses, two items were applied (with calculated Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86) 1
Single or several binary questions measuring stigma 2
Stigma Awareness scale, 5 items on a 4-point Likert scale (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.80; Stereotype Threat, 6 items (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79). 1
Stigma scale with no details given about the scale, but it is mentioned that “stigma metrics were evaluated using a previously validated index covering various stigma factors”. 1
Stigma scale, 15 items on a 4-point scale (referring to amount of people), and two factors (following EFA and PCA): "devalue" (6 items, Cronbach’s alpha = 0.61), "discredit" (9 items, Cronbach’s alpha = 0.80) 1
Stigma scale, 6 items, 4-point Likert scale, Cronbach’s α = 0.73 1
Stigma scale, anticipated stigma: 2 items, and experienced stigma: 7 items, both scales with binary responses (FSW: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.865, MSW: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.822) 1
Stigma scale, experienced stigma: 9 items, perceived stigma: 5 items, and anticipated stigma: 4 items, all scales with binary responses 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14

ST_2_1 Stigma type_2_1

Stigma type(s) measured in the study.

Vrednost 697 Frekvenca
anticipated 1
experienced 7
internalized 2
perceived 4
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14 0

ST_2_2 Stigma type_2_2

Stigma type(s) measured in the study.

Vrednost 706 Frekvenca
anticipated 1
experienced 1
internalized 2
perceived 3
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
7 0

ST_2_3 Stigma type_2_3

Stigma type(s) measured in the study.

Vrednost 715 Frekvenca
anticipated 2
internalized 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
3 0

ODR_2 Occupational Domain/Risk_2

Occupational domain affected by stigma: access to services, private life, violence, health, career).

Vrednost 724 Frekvenca
Access to services/ experienced stigma associated with avoidance and delay of services (anticipated stigma mainly not associated) 1
Access to services/ stigma associated with ART interruption 1
Access to services/stigma affects HIV testing 1
Access to services/stigma as barrier to accessing health care services 1
Access to services/stigma associated with retention in HIV care 1
Mental health/greater prevalence of experienced stigma in group of SWs with depressed symptoms 1
Mental health/stigma a risk factor for depressive symptoms 1
Mental health/stigma as predictor of psychiatry disorder diagnosis 1
Mental health/stigma awareness has a significant negative path to general self-esteem 1
Mental health/stigma predicting suicide ideation/attempts, depressive symptoms, and loneliness 1
Sexual health/ stigma not associated with ART use 1
Sexual health/ stigma; associated with CAVS with any non-paying partners 1
Sexual health/greater prevalence of HIV sero-status in SWs with higher stigma score 1
Sexual health/stigma undermines consistent condom use with clients and steady partners 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14

Res2_1 Results_2_1

Summary of key data from results.

Vrednost 733 Frekvenca
FSW: [Experienced HSW stigma & avoidance of HIV C&T services] OR = 1.21; 95 percent CI = 1.01, 1.46, p p=less than .05 [Experienced HSW stigma & delay of non-HIV services] OR = 1.10; 95 percent CI = 1.01, 1.21, p=less than .05 [Experienced HSW stigma & avoidance of non-HIV servic 1
[Enacted stigma score & HIV sero-status] PR = 1.1; 95percent CI = 1.0, 1.3 (0/ 1 score) PR = 1.1; 95 percent CI = 0.9., 1.2, (0/ 1 score) PR = 1.0; 95 percent CI = 0.9, 1.2. (0/ 2 score) PR = 1.1; 95percent CI = 1.0, 1.2 (0/ 2-4 score) PR = 1.3; 95percent CI = 1.1, 1.5, (0/ 5-9 s 1
[Experience of stigma & depressed/not depressed score on SRQ] p = 0.036 [Experience of stigma & depressed/not depressed score on PHQ 9] p = 0.012 (phi = 0.22) 1
[FSW-related discrimination in clinic & interruption of ART] OR = 3.99; 95 percent CI = 1.79, 8.89, p=less than .01 aOR = 3.24; 95 percent CI = 1.28, 8.20, p=less than .01 [FW self-stigma scale & interruption of ART] OR = 1.08; 95percent CI=1.02, 1.14, less than .05 aOR=1.09; 95percent CI=1.02, 1.1 1
[FSW-related discrimination in clinic & retention in HIV care] OR = 0.62; 95 percent CI = 0.30, 1.28, [FW self-stigma scale & retention in HIV care] OR = 0.93; 95 percent CI = 0.89, 0.98, p=less than .01 aOR = 0.93; 95 percent CI = 0.88, 0.98, p=less than .01 1
[Felt excluded by acquaintances & Diagnosis of any psychiatric disorder] OR = 3.20; 95 percent CI = 1.76, 5.82, p=less than .001 [Felt excluded by society & Diagnosis of any psychiatric disorder] OR = 3.65; 95 percent CI = 1.97, 6.75, p=less than .001 1
[Occupation SW stigma & barriers to accessing health services] OR = 1.76; 95percent CI = 1.05, 2.95, p=less than .01 aOR = 1.85 CI = 1.07, 3.20, p=less than .05 1
[Perceived occupational stigma & depressive symptoms] 1
[SW stigma & CAVS acts w/ any non-paying partners] IRR=1.15; 95percent CI=1.04, 1.27, p= 0.007 aIRR=1.18; 95 percent CI=1.06, 1.32, p-= 0.003 [SW stigma & CAS acts w/ male non-paying partners] IRR = 1.11; 95 percent CI = .96, 1.27, p = 0.16 aIRR=1.18; 95 percent CI = .98, 1
[SW stigma & CCU w/clients] Stand. coef. = -0.48; SE = 0.15, p = .001 [SW stigma & CCU w/steady partners] Stand. coef. = - 0.35; SE = 0.12, p = .004 1
[Stigma & suicide] β = .095, 95 percent CI = 0.020, 1.00, p= less than.01 [Stigma & depressive symptoms] β = .261, 95percent CI = 0.177, 0.286, p=less than .001 [Stigma & loneliness] β = .148, 95percent CI = 0.062, 0.154, p =less than .001 1
[Stigma Awareness & General self-esteem] 1
[Stigma index score & ART use] PR = 0.88; 95 percent CI =0 .68, 1.14, p = 0.700 (low/ medium stigma) PR = 3.65; 95 percent CI = 0.46, 1.53, p = 0.691 (low/ high stigma) 1
[Stigma related to sex work & recent HIV Testing] [Refused medical care & recent HIV testing] aOR = 1.37 (0.47, 3.99), p = .56 [Fear of being treated badly at the doctor & recent HIV testing] aOR = 2.45 (0.92, 6.55), p = .07 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14

Res2_2 Results_2_2

Summary of key data from results.

Vrednost 742 Frekvenca
R ² = -.338, p=less than.001 1
aOR = 1.33, 95percent (1.10, 1.60)], p = .004 1
β (S.E) = .12 (0.06), p = .05 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
3 0

MD_2 Main domain_2

Main domains of occupational risks.

Vrednost 751 Frekvenca
Barriers to utilization of services 5
Increased risk for STI 4
Mental distress 4
Negative impact on sense of self/ self-esteem 1
Veljavni odgovori Neveljavni odgovori Minimum Maksimum Aritmetična sredina Standardni odklon
14 0

Dostop do podatkov in dokumentacije - Nesstar


POGOJI UPORABE:

Licenca Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva

STATUS RAZISKAVE

4 - Polni opis raziskave in kodirna knjiga spremenljivk s polnim besedilom vprašanj.

KATEGORIJA RAZISKAVE

7 - teoretsko ali praktično pomembne raziskave, omejene na manj splošno populacijo, manj vplivne

  Kako citiram to RAZISKAVO?

Markelj, L., Šori, I., Bajt, V., Bolko, I., Hrženjak, M. in Učakar, T. (2023). Seksualno delo globalno, 2022: Sistematični pregled mednarodne literature o vplivu stigme na poklicna tveganja [Podatkovna datoteka]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov. ADP - IDNo: SDSLO22. https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_SDSLO22_V1

COBISS.SI
Cobiss tip: 2.20
Datum prve podatkovne objave: 2023